http://superdynamic.livejournal.com/ (
superdynamic.livejournal.com) wrote in
damned_bulletin2009-08-09 06:50 pm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
(no subject)
. . . Federal training? Does anyone know what that's about?
And does anyone have more information on what exactly happened to Landel?
And does anyone have more information on what exactly happened to Landel?
no subject
--A.F. II
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
-服部
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
[anon]
Re: [anon]
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
[unsigned]
Re: [unsigned]
[unsigned]
Re: [unsigned]
[unsigned]
Re: [unsigned]
[unsigned]
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
But it was for things like desk jobs and public service jobs. Nothing that would apply here....
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
What's interesting is that it was an automated announcement, and not that Lydia woman.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Anyway, someone mentioned that the announcement might have been an accident, and you seem to be really good with mechanical things so... is it possible for an old announcement like that to be made on accident?
(no subject)
no subject
...it also begs the question of whether the acronym used is simply that, or whether 'Iris' is a person's name. If so, who is she, and what role does she have in all of this?
no subject
no subject
no subject
[Disguised and anon]
Re: [Disguised and anon]
[Still disguised and anon] (Oh, how ironic this is, no? XD )
Re: [Still disguised and anon] (Oh, how ironic this is, no? XD )
Re: [Disguised and anon]
[Still disguised and anon]
Re: [Still disguised and anon]
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
unsigned, but in his natural hand
Of course, there's no way to be sure the message is even legitimate. Just because a man on an intercom claims to be a Martian...
Re: unsigned, but in his natural hand
no subject
It's all bullshit.
-- S.T.
no subject
[same handwriting]
Re: [same handwriting]
[same handwriting]
Re: [same handwriting]
(no subject)
(no subject)
[same handwriting]
Re: [same handwriting]
[same handwriting]
Pedentic Sweep is pedantic.