damned_bulletin | [anonymous]

Sarcasm: I'm so hurt. I think I shall cry. To be insulted by a meatbag, this is a true shame.

[one might notice a slight smudge mark on the writing, as if someone licked their finger and ran it over the message]

It's real, HK. Now will you two mute it already?

Statement: Oh. Well, good for the melodramatic person at being devoted to their craft.

Reply: But this is fun! Or at least, something to take my mind off how terribly the day has gone so far!

Aw, did someone have a bad day? Want me to hold you while you sleep tonight?

[strikeout, no matter how hard he tried to black it out, is still legible.]

Affirmative: Yes. Me. ~~Denial:~~ No.

We'll talk later, where the meatbags can't see everything. How's that sound?

Answer: Better than the alternative, although continuation of this might mean hunting down interrupting meatbags and introducing them forcefully to sharp implements, which is always fun.

And people call me fruity.

Query: Are you a fruitbag, then?

No, but I think you might be.

Statement: That would be messy and illogical. I would be worried about rotting. Well, more immediately than these meatbag bodies do.

You obviously need a 'slang' dictionary in the tinbag processor of yours, darling.

Statement: I have my suspicions as to what that term means, but I saw an opportunity to be more irritating with a literal interpretation.

Well, unfortunately for you, you failed to do anything but look like a fool♥

I am not a meatbag, you piece of junk.

Statement: If you are a former inorganic, then you are not a meatbag. If you were made out of some inclassifiable substance that made you appear to be a meatbag anyway, then you were a meatbag, for lack of a better term.

For lack of a better term? What shoddy classifications you have, tinbag.

Statement: All are meatbag until proven innocent.

Explanation: It was the only designation that my master told me I must use to describe others. Therefore, I keep to my master's instructions.

Technically, you are, too, you know.

Oh, how cute♥ Following your master's orders.

Statement: Technically, yes. But my processor is still mapped in a non-meatbag fashion, at the very least.

I see no reason to not do so. It is in my programming to obey my master and my master only.

Aaahn, I do love the loyal characters. They're sooo adorable.

Statement: I will deny that characterization until I rust solid.

Ooh, prickly. Even better than before.

[anonymous]

Re: [same anon, but in pen]

Re: [same anon, but in pen]

Re: [same anon, but in pen]

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

[same anon, but in pen]

Re: [same anon, but in pen]

[same anon, but in pen]

Re: [same anon, but in pen]

[same anon, but in pen]

Re: [same anon, but in pen]

[same anon, but in pen]

[same anon, but in pen]

Re: [same anon, but in pen]

[same anon, but in pen]

Re: [same anon, but in pen]

[same anon, but in pen]

Re: [same anon, but in pen]

[same anon, but in pen]

Re: [same anon, but in pen]

[same anon, but in pen]