ext_289193 (
tsunagari.livejournal.com) wrote in
damned_bulletin2007-07-12 11:45 pm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
(no subject)
Apparently others can respond to these notes?
I have spoken to a couple friends on this matter, but it's still leaving me doubtful.
The impossibility of people being pulled from different places in time - what can you tell me?
~ Sai
I have spoken to a couple friends on this matter, but it's still leaving me doubtful.
The impossibility of people being pulled from different places in time - what can you tell me?
~ Sai
no subject
no subject
no subject
If someone you know is here, there's no guarantee they'll be familiar with you, or be the same from before you were brought here.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
That someone extremely powerful could have us kidnapped and somehow dampen chakra control is unlikely, but not impossible. To take us from different times is something different entirely.
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
--A.F. II
no subject
no subject
Most recently, I traveled to a place called Hybras--a land only accessible through a very complicated time spell, inhabited by demons. Since this place did not exist in my time or dimension for that matter, I began to theorize that the places and times with which we are so familiar are not on the same timeline. We all have different methods of measuring time, different famous persons, different abilities--all of which are foreign to those we don't know before coming here.
Therefore, it is my belief that we all exist in different dimensions or places outside our realm of influence. We have been brought together by some outside force or other for some purpose which I have not discerned yet.
I hope that explains things.
--A.F. II
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Does that help?
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Still, it looks like others have taken some decent efforts to educate you. Do you have any other questions?
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
[Unsigned]
no subject
no subject
--A.T.