ext_272160 (
mylackofeffort.livejournal.com) wrote in
damned_bulletin2007-10-01 02:51 pm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
(no subject)
Renji,
My friends and I think we might try to work alone for now, but we're open to an exchange of information and tools. We'll find a way to repay you for the information that you've provided us, and if we ever discover anything about this place you'll be one of the first people to know.
Thank you. I do really appreciate the extended hand of friendship and the offering of alliance.
Perhaps we may want to join your group in the future, but for now we'll stick to what we know and that's each other.
-- Quatre
02, I was thinking of meeting you in the same place as before (if that's alright with our resident politician). Make sure 01 knows the directions to the party, please?
Maybe we should think of a name to call ourselves too.
My friends and I think we might try to work alone for now, but we're open to an exchange of information and tools. We'll find a way to repay you for the information that you've provided us, and if we ever discover anything about this place you'll be one of the first people to know.
Thank you. I do really appreciate the extended hand of friendship and the offering of alliance.
Perhaps we may want to join your group in the future, but for now we'll stick to what we know and that's each other.
-- Quatre
02, I was thinking of meeting you in the same place as before (if that's alright with our resident politician). Make sure 01 knows the directions to the party, please?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I promise not to touch anything. :)
no subject
no subject
no subject
[Strikes 'coincidently' still legible if you try]
It's only for Quatre's sake that I'm not knocking your lights out for that.Re: [Strikes 'coincidently' still legible if you try]
Go ahead and try. I'm always up for a fight.
Re: [Strikes 'coincidently' still legible if you try]
Re: [Strikes 'coincidently' still legible if you try]
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
He'll probably get there before I do.I also see you've got a gift to pick up. Mind if I save you some time and grab it on the way? The room's in my block, anyway.
~02
no subject
I found someone who knew about mobile suits and space colonies, but they weren't the same as ours. I'll tell you guys more about it tonight.
It's not my room, ask him. I'm not your message boy.
-04
no subject
Never said you were. :) Just trying to save you some trouble.
no subject
And someone doesn't like the numbers that OZ gave us. Maybe we should tell them to take it up with OZ?
no subject
Haha. I'd like to see that.
no subject
It's even odder for me to say, because for me OZ hasn't been an organization for over a year.
no subject
You shouldn't get my hopes up.
(no subject)
[Strikes hardly legible, but you could try?]
(no subject)
[Strikes are readable]
[Strikes are illegible]
Re: [Strikes are illegible]
(no subject)
(no subject)
[strikeouts very nearly illegible]
(no subject)
(no subject)
[Strikes still quite readable]
[Strikes readable if you squint]
Re: [Strikes readable if you squint]
[Strikes readable if you squint]
Re: [Strikes readable if you squint]
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
We did it first; try usin' a more original naming scheme, would you?
-II
no subject
Hey, what's the deal, pal? I hear imitation's the best form of flattery, but back off a little, would you?
Keep your pretty roman numerals to yourself.
no subject
Two good reasons for this. Number one? Professional pride; I can't let random people take the numbering system or people'll get awful screwed up. Two? 'cause I can.
An' if you think my numbers are pretty, you should see me in person.
-II
no subject
I don't mean to be argumentative, but your numbers and our numbers aren't likely to get mixed up, since ours are model registration numbers and yours are roman numerals. They look completely different.
no subject
See, that'd answer the first point, kinda, if you squint. Doesn't do a thing for the second. 'sides, you have names and stuff, an' it's not like anyone's going to be fooled for a second, so why bother?
-II
no subject
no subject
-II
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
It happens to be the principle of the matter. Stop that immediately.